CAD Development : Search Results: Stickers in LDraw


CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw

Results 6281 – 6300 of 7032.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) as (...) depth. (...) as (...) can be used (...) individual (...) Service (...) and the (...) models up in (...) Lego set, a (...) OK I can live with that. (...) c...etc. let the (...) appearing in the (...) Do you have to have everything that (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) between a (...) (commmonly known as (...) number, or a (...) the model and (...) be omitted. (...) cause some (...) Exactly! :) OK, I guess we've reached the decision that the first letter is to be S instead of M. What I had origonally done (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) I agree. Although having both the instructions and the set is infinitely better than having neither the instructions nor the set, a set can probably be checked having only the instructions and not the set, to an accuracy of 99% or higher (if (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
John VanZwieten wrote in message ... (...) set (...) different (...) only (...) "T7140a_1". I (...) how (...) What if we would consider the content of a duplicate set as alternate models of the same set numbers. Eg. 7140 is duplicate set then, (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) That's a great question. Someone with only the instructions ought to be able to find suspicious looking things (e.g., potential mistakes), but probably can't prove something to be 100.00% correct. Some LEGO instruction booklets do contain (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: AUTHORS subdirectory?
(...) I think this already works. (...) That'd be nice. It'd be one step in making LDraw into less of an "amateur"[1] CAD program. --Bram [1] As in the results and programming, not the users. I think Ldraw should remain as least as easy to use as it (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: What color is on front of Rebel pilot?
I really don't think a new one is necessary... who's gonna look inside of the torso when they are looking at something in ldraw... well... maybe this might come from some of those "anal" people on that other thread :) as long as the torso has the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) Ryan and I had decided on M####-, where #### stood for the set number and stood for the last two digits of the year it was released (i.e. M7140-99 for the X-Wing). The date would be replaced by a letter to denote that it is a submodel. (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
OK since the header seems to be a problem I will use set 7130 as an example and I will explain each part of the header in depth. 0 Name: M7130-99.dat 0 Snowspeeder 0 Author: Ryan Dennett 0 Official Model Repository OK line one: M stands for model, (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
(...) Though convenient for us, inconvenient for them. As I noted it could discourage immediate submissions, which would help the Repository. But on the other hand it would be good for people to note their own errors - especially for us, so we don't (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
Dear Tim, I agree with idea to standardize the TLG model header and filename. Some comments: Tim Courtney wrote in message ... (...) 1. If we use the plain set number as filename, this may lead to confusion, because I'm sure there are identical part (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) do you need to own the set to be able to check it? or would the instructions suffice? (...) 0 7140 x-wing fighter 0 author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Official Model (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Buildmpd utility
Awhile ago, I grabbed the source code for Jacob Sparre Andersen's buildmpd utility. I compiled it, and I've been using it since then. Recently, I've been trying to e-mail a copy of the executable to him, so he could post it on his website. For some (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) and (...) send them if (...) we can to get (...) Tim, I'm the person who was supposed to be helping with the reviewing and editting so that 'we' also refers to me. Who else was willing to help? I'll still review and edit, but could someone (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) Typically, sets with duplicate numbers have nothing to do with each other.[1] So it isn't really accurate to consider one set as an alternate of the other. Steve 1) There are exceptions, where variations of a set are available, such as 6938, (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) Ahh, nope, I'm not. Well, not exactly. There are two different ways to look at "uninlining": one view is that it's simply removing the extra code, and restoring the original reference statement. This approach works, as long as you have the (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
Since we appear to be using MPD for the Model Repository, I think its usefulness could be extended. Because of the patterned parts rule - if there isn't a decorated element for a set use the undecorated version - we will need a list of all errors in (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
(...) model repository, I (...) made any TLG models (...) email them to me (...) set number as the (...) set number and ** (...) M7140-99 for (...) that it is a (...) Yes, we had, and to explain why; some people might have unofficial parts in their (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
We should develop rules for official model creating and submitting to the OMR. First off, we can't expect all submissions to follow our header/filename system. The model editors will have to make sure each file follows those rules. Here are my (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

		Re: part numbers screwed up?
(...) I took a look at the part files, and it appears (check the comment files in the 9903 update to be 100% sure) the following moves occured: 3942 (Cone 4 x 4 x 2) was moved to 3943. 3939 (Cone 2 x 2 x 2) was moved to 3942. 3951 was moved to 3939, (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.160)

More: Next Page >>