|
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Paul Gyugyi wrote in message <36D65C66.E5F7A69@gy...yi.com>... (...) to (...) part/tracking (...) This is certainly true with metallic elements, but with clear I don't think so since ABS resin or any plastic resin I've seen is basic clear amber (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: concave polys and LDraw
|
| (...) Someone (sorry, I totally don't remember who) suggested that you can generate an optional line between two poly's (pollies?) by using the center-points of the poly's as the test-points (points 3 and 4). I don't know how well this works, but (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) The problem with that solution is that we would then have the 4106548 hard coded as yellow. And when the tan version is released are we then going to have another 410xxxx for it - hard coded to tan? That may not seem like a big deal, until you (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36daaf01.8075147@lu...et.com>... (...) I'd say you're most certainly right here since their numbering system would be for premarket tracking and not as we would use it in the post-market. Does anyone know if TLG sells (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Selçuk wrote in message ... (...) come (...) Actually, you could consider some of the digressions as idle chatter until something more interesting comes up. Unless the idle chatter IS more interesting. (...) None the less, speculation as to why TLG (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| onyx wrote in message ... (...) library (...) possible... a (...) organize/search (...) Here you miss the point that some of us don't care a flip for TLG's nomemclature. TLG has its own reason for using it that doesn't make any sense for what we (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) 1. Understood. 2. That's a given. I don't really expect to see detail. It is not something that would be a requirement, IMO. (...) No idea. It was news to me. Joshua might know something about it, but he never mentioned that one to me. (...) I (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) The problem is a bit more narrow than that. Basic pieces, like the 1x2 brick, are not affected by all this numbering/coloring controversy. Those pieces had a simple part number that is common to all the colors. So we would NOT be having (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) We could go that route, just have the two halves and no shortcut. The important thing is this would still be an accurate use of the numbers, but without carring it to the logical extreme and having the complete part. (...) True. Note that in (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) True. As the best way to keep everyone at least somewhat happy. (...) I don't want to over-use 3-digit numbers. Only where necessary and unavoidable. For instance; The complete yellow dinghy does have the correct number. So we can make a (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) ^^^...^^^ Agreed, except that in the case of the 1x2 brick -- there are two molds still in use today: one with a post down the center and one without. The one without the post is of course the one used for little windows -- like in (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
| (...) Hollow, solid, or tube-shaped? I'd also like to see discs, arcs, spheres and cones. And some spline-thingy, I suppose. How about boolean operators? INTERSECT, UNION, and whatever's the proper term for "All of A that's outside of B". Steve (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
| (to jump in, or to stay out. Decisions, decisions. Oh, what the heck.) Why wait for LDraw2 to come up with better ways to produce part-files? It would be *great* if LDraw2 can handle multiple source-file formats, but that's a different issue. I (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
| (...) Going back to the question of new line-types in LDraw2, if we had all the curved-surface types, there would be little or no use for the Type-5 line, as long as we could specify that a specific object should be outlined/edged. Or have separate (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw/CAD links
|
| Todd: (...) [...] (...) in "amter" (counties?) and then in major cities. That's fine, but you might want to fix the names. - Nordjylland (Fredrikshavn, Ålborg?) - Vestjylland (Ribe) - Østjylland (Århus, Billund?) - Sønderjylland (Sønderborg, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw/CAD links
|
| (...) Use a single link for both tools. I would suggest that you identify the it as "MPD Tools". Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 31-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Ldraw.org: Organization and look & feel
|
| Tim: (...) I haven't got any of these for Netscape and I run lynx with a plain sans serif fixed width font I don't know the name of. :-) And lynx is just another browser. I am using version 2.8.1pre.9 (10 Oct 1998). You can find information about (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
