|
 | | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) You continue to amaze, Leonardo. To have not been a programmer that recently, and to have come up with LeoCAD and make it work so well, it shocks me a little (in a good way). :) (...) I wouldn't go that far. In fact, I'd caution that we be (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) Good idea. So I take it someone who submits a model specifies which it is, and they also get to choose which version they model. But what if we have too much of one type, and want to balance it out? Should they be required to do both? And the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| At 10:40 PM 7/22/99 , Todd Lehman wrote: [...] snippety snip (...) Right.. (...) Now that's making sense. I was following the assumption that nothing would change on cad.dat.models.sets and OMR submissions would be *allowed* there. Could we change (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) Yes. Those that are non-instruction submodels but purely for ease of modelling are definitely acceptable. (I gotta remember to throw that one in the creation/submission guide) (...) Good thoughts. I would say that the models which do not (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) Searching through a potential lot of messages for the word 'OMR.' (...) But posting a submission to an OMR group and casually posting to a sets group are in fact different. One there is strict requirements for, the other there isn't. So it (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) But having its own group, even under cad.dat.models.sets, would save model editors time by not having to browse headers. And additional features could possibly be integrated into an OMR specific group, like marking a message approved or (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) So basically no difference, really. That is, you can visually scan a hundred messages for "OMR" in a second or two -- or even faster with a script -- but where 99.9% of the time goes is verifying the quality of the model. So pulling down 5 new (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | RE: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) Well, I'm pretty sure you didn't, as I was anxious and alert about your reactions to L3P. An "invitation" in the very first L3P announcement of August 27th 1998: (...) and some later on was apparently ignored? But never mind that now. I will (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | ldraw.org Model of the Month
|
| Yet another mini-project that can enhance ldraw.org... I remember talking about the Model of the Month feature and plans for it, but discussion fizzled. I think we can get this up and running in a few days if we recall what was discussed and if (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | POV-Ray Chain Program
|
| Hi All! I was surfing the web the other day and discovered a wonderful plug-in for POV-Ray that can create chains. Considering all the talk about hoses and a desire for the chain piece in Ldraw I thought it would be great if this programs ideas (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
| (...) Nope. I agree with what you guys are saying on hoses too. They *should* be in the model. And its not a job left over for the model editors either ;) -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: why is no-one saying anything about my parts?
|
| every part in the current voting batch is made with the real piece in hand. (this also applies to parts not in the vote but posted to cad.dat.parts recently such as the wheel hard plastic large) every part has been checked by me before (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | RE: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) You should try the beta v1.2 Win32 L3P32: (URL) have successfully used it for a 6000 part model. Be sure to try out the new STUDS flag in the POV-file to reduce rendering time during the test renderings. and Bram Lambrecht wrote in another (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| Tim: The new article on MLCad is good. I like the linking graphics, but Todd is correct in pointing out the potential problem. Since we can be sure TLG will see the site soon (if they haven't been there yet), we can just as well be polite and ask (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) I'm not disagreeing here. But could it be optional to editors to change a pivot point if they feel they have the time or if they feel that it would severely enhance the model? I'll also add the pivot point thing to the creation/submission (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | RE: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) I agree that Anton's settings are the best: (URL) makes me wanna reach out my hand and grab the model. I think he uses just one light (area-light) and maybe also radiosity. (...) Yes, like John VanZwieten suggested: (URL) The slope bricks (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| | Re: POV-Ray Chain Program
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Jonathan Wilson writes: Hi, I'll check out the math and look for a more LDraw-like approach. I had already some problems with the elastic parts, and now indeed need a chain for OMR 8844 (blue small helicopter). My first intention (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.984)
|
