To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 966
965  |  967
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 3 Apr 1999 03:15:51 GMT
Viewed: 
88 times
  
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999 00:24:43 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote:

[Big snip]

I think there is some value in classifying real TLG models separately from
MOCs.  You, Todd, could have

lugnet.cad.dat.sets
lugnet.cad.dat.creations

Which aren't completely self-obvious, but nothing's perfect.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
 
(...) I like those. I think "sets" is a lot clearer than anything containing the letters "tlg", especially when placed alongside "parts" or "elements" and "creations." It's also nice and short, easy to type. :) OK, let's summarize all of the (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
 
[Added lugnet.cad.dev to newsgroups list] (...) A little bit, yes, but not a lot. Since you bring it up, now a good time to give it a second round of consideration. Here are some of my thoughts: One thing that would work out nicely in the .parts (...) (26 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)

27 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR