| |
Primitives are handled by the primitives group, and should be sent to the
group. I see no purpose in having them in the cad.dat.parts.
What do you mean by "Dat versions of bitmaps"?
-John Van
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Dragonelf1@aol.com (Jeff Stembel) writes:
> > What about new Primitives? Would they go into the .parts subcatagory?
> > Also, I'm somewhat talented at making the small bitmaps for new parts.
> > Would they (Dat versions of the bitmaps) go into the .parts subcategory
> > also?
>
> I would think so...rather than .parts.prim and .parts.bmp -- unless there's
> a real clear advantage to having these separated.
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
