| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dragonelf1@aol.com (Jeff Stembel) writes:
> What about new Primitives? Would they go into the .parts subcatagory?
> Also, I'm somewhat talented at making the small bitmaps for new parts.
> Would they (Dat versions of the bitmaps) go into the .parts subcategory
> also?
I would think so...rather than .parts.prim and .parts.bmp -- unless there's
a real clear advantage to having these separated.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
| Primitives are handled by the primitives group, and should be sent to the group. I see no purpose in having them in the cad.dat.parts. What do you mean by "Dat versions of bitmaps"? -John Van Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
| (...) Primitives are a special case. Right now, consideration and approval of any new primitive file is done by consensus of a small group of part authors. Anyone may suggest a primitive to that group. And new members can be added to that group, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <Snipped the Lengthy but interesting Message> What about new Primitives? Would they go into the .parts subcatagory? Also, I'm somewhat talented at making the small bitmaps for new parts. Would they (Dat (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
