Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Apr 1999 03:24:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1199 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:21:36 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Dragonelf1@aol.com (Jeff Stembel) writes:
> > What about new Primitives? Would they go into the .parts subcatagory?
> > Also, I'm somewhat talented at making the small bitmaps for new parts.
> > Would they (Dat versions of the bitmaps) go into the .parts subcategory
> > also?
>
> I would think so...rather than .parts.prim and .parts.bmp -- unless there's
> a real clear advantage to having these separated.
>
> --Todd
Primitives are a special case. Right now, consideration and approval of any
new primitive file is done by consensus of a small group of part authors.
Anyone may suggest a primitive to that group. And new members can be added to
that group, with the consensus of the groups members.
It was felt that better results and higher quality could be achieved this way.
This also streamlines the process of adding new primitives. If the group says
add it, I do.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
