Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Mar 1999 22:01:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
824 times
|
| |
|
|
I would suggest just lugnet.cad.dat, but either way is fine with me.
-John Van
Sproaticus wrote in message <370297E0.B6E235A0@geocities.com>...
> John VanZwieten wrote:
> > Have you thought any more about adding lugnet.cad.dat.parts and/or
> > lugnet.cad.dat.tlgsets?
>
> If so, would MOCs go into lugnet.cad.dat or lugnet.cad.dat.moc?
>
> Cheers,
> - jsproat
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
| [Added lugnet.cad.dev to newsgroups list] (...) A little bit, yes, but not a lot. Since you bring it up, now a good time to give it a second round of consideration. Here are some of my thoughts: One thing that would work out nicely in the .parts (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
