Subject:
|
Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:49:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2157 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> > All the examples given so far for "appropriate" uses of the dither tag were to
> > reproduce dithered printing on actual LEGO parts.
>
> Actually, I've most recently used dithering to simulate chrome/metal/metallic parts.
Well, I don't think that qualifies as an argument for its inclusion in the new
!COLOUR statement, since those are already covered by the more precise
pre-defined materials.
--Travis Cobbs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
| (...) I'm not sure you're right there. I think Steve may have been trying to achieve a specific dithered look, different from the effect created by the pre-defined metal code in say ldview or ldglite, probably to better differentiate some static (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
28 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|