To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 9480
9479  |  9481
Subject: 
Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 03:37:57 GMT
Viewed: 
2117 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
Actually, while it doesn't actually say one way or another, I would vote to have
the required parameters (CODE, VALUE, and EDGE) always be in the same order.
Any optional parameters should not be order-dependent, but I think the required
ones should be.

I don't see a problem with this.  Steve or Jacob?

I don't want to specify that some parameters are order-specific, and others aren't.
I'd rather they are all one way or the other.  Goes back to easier 'correct' parsing.

However, I'm sure the entries in ldconfig.ldr will always have their tags in a set
order.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
 
(...) How about NAME? (...) I don't see a problem with this. Steve or Jacob? -Orion (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

28 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR