Subject:
|
Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:09:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4449 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > > The name should be the characters after the !COLOR keyword and before the next
> > > keyword. The only contraint I can think of is that is not be one of the other
> > > keywords.
> >
> > I won't make any guarantees, but there's a reasonably high probability that I
> > won't even try to support the above, even if it's what the spec says in the end.
> > It's too much of a pain. Additionally, it disallows further expansion of the
> > colour statement with new keywords.
> >
> > However, if we require the CODE keyword to come next, it would solve both
> > problems.
>
> How about NAME?
Disregard the NAME suggestion. I'm brain dead today.
-Orion
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
