Subject:
|
Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 03:31:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2011 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Don Heyse wrote:
> I think it's best if you just strike the dither-transparency
> sentence from the specs.
OK, I'm alright with that.
> Maybe so, but it would certainly come in handy on the aquashark
> craterplate. What about the idea of using the DITHER color to describe
> the color of the embedded bits in METALLIC colors?
If that's a needed parameter, I'd rather have it follow the METALLIC keyword.
> Perhaps if you really want to dictate how to represent an ARGB color
> with a checkerboard stipple pattern you should use a tag like this:
> STIPPLE 50% #AARRGGBB #AARRGGBB.
I'm ok with that, too. Is '50%' really an adequate description? There can be many
brush patterns...
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
| (...) I realize many current ldraw rendering programs use a stipple pattern to render transparent surfaces. I do it in ldglite because I'm too lazy to do the sorting required to use alpha blending. However, I don't really want the specs to dictate (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
