Subject:
|
Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:18:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1838 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> I say ditch dither support completely, and just specify the
> color you really want.
I could go for that. Simpler is better!
Of course that means the METALLIC (or PEARLY) tag needs an argument
to define the color of the embedded bits. If you want it to be the
same color as the substrate, just use the same color code.
Don
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
| (...) I've been keeping clear on the dither issue so far, because I didn't have a strong opinion one way or another. However, the more I think about it, the more I think we're not seeing the forest through the trees. Because of this, I vote we (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
