Subject:
|
Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 03:33:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4767 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> All the examples given so far for "appropriate" uses of the dither tag were to
> reproduce dithered printing on actual LEGO parts.
Actually, I've most recently used dithering to simulate chrome/metal/metallic parts.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
| (...) Well, I don't think that qualifies as an argument for its inclusion in the new !COLOUR statement, since those are already covered by the more precise pre-defined materials. --Travis Cobbs (23 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
| (...) I've been keeping clear on the dither issue so far, because I didn't have a strong opinion one way or another. However, the more I think about it, the more I think we're not seeing the forest through the trees. Because of this, I vote we (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
