Subject:
|
Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:06:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1966 times
|
| |
|
|
I have these comments:
1) Why not use COLOURDEF in stead of introducing the'!' ?
2) CHROME | METALLIC | RUBBER seem to me like materials. Are they just shortcuts for convenience?
3) It should be possible to specify RGB color in decimal. Either r,g,b or RGB(r,g,b) is fine with me.
Would anyone like to specify RGB using fractions (0.0 - 1.0) ?
4) EDGE e, if e is a color code, I assume it must be evaluated when actually used and not "now"
since e can be redefined later in ldconfig.ldr.
5) About scoping, I'm reluctant to support color redefinition anywhere. I would like simply to
read %LDRAWDIR%\ldconfig.ldr at the beginning.
Otherwise Travis has expressed most of my comments very well, thanks.
/Lars
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
| (...) There had been discussion previously about differentiating true comments from meta-statements. The LSC agreed that it seems like a good idea to start prefixing meta-keywords with a punctuation mark, and we chose !. And !COLOUR is shorter than (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | [LSC] Colour Definition meta-statement
|
| Here's the initial write up for a color definition meta-statement, to be used in ldconfig.ldr and in any model file. The LSC has a couple of outstanding issues with this spec, let's discuss those in follow-up messages. Please respond with any (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
