Subject:
|
Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 01:36:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
672 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
> "Carsten Schmitz" <casz@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > IMHO this is the best and most compatible idea so far. I believe Don
> > Heyse had the same idea too.
>
> Ah, it was never my intention to "steal" anyone's idea. I just haven't
> had the time to read all the interesting LUGNET articles recently.
Actually you didn't steal anything, I had a different idea:
> > > > How about replacing the .dat extension with the pattern number for
> > > > these filenames? (Something like 3626bp.101)
Which you refuted:
> > > But will that work in LEdit? I normally specify part names in LEdit
> > > by the base file name, i.e. everything before the ".DAT" and LEdit
> > > adds the ".DAT".
before explaining your completely different (and perhaps better) idea.
However, I just tested my scheme in LEDIT and it worked. So there! ;^)
If you specify a filename with no extension in LEDIT it adds the .DAT.
A filename like abcdefgh.101 is accepted though. Also if you want to
load a file with no extension you need to use a trailing dot or it will
add the .DAT.
Anyways, my plan is workable, but is there a better way?
Don
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
| (...) Ah, it was never my intention to "steal" anyone's idea. I just haven't had the time to read all the interesting LUGNET articles recently. Fredrik (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
