Subject:
|
Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:43:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
766 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Carsten Schmitz writes:
> - World is evolving. Even not so wealthy users should be now at a
> development level of Windows 95a (first version) (how many years Win95
> exists now?).
And the rich set the pace ? What you say here only confirms that you're part
of an economy with a relatively high consumption rate. Maybe your view of "the
World" is not a realistic one. For instance, I personaly made the tranfer from
MS-DOS to Windows on April 3th this year, that is less than a year ago.
Greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Manfred Moolhuysen writes: Please no emotionful 'rich people set the pace , poor people are starving' discussions. That is off-topic. I'm a technical consultant and a programmer. So of course I have a technical point of view. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
| Hello Manfred, I don't want to be ignorant, but... - World is evolving. Even not so wealthy users should be now at a development level of Windows 95a (first version) (how many years Win95 exists now?). - The 'old' technology (here the 8.3 filenames) (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
