Subject:
|
Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 23:29:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
856 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> > Longer term, we are going to need a different, better solution for this.
> > Anyone have any suggestions?
>
> I can't remember the last time "dropping DOS support" came up, but it seems
> like a very long time ago! Is "real DOS" (not real-mode DOS :o) still really
> something that needs to be supported? I understand that DOS as a filesystem
> format needs to be supported, but since Micros~1 added the ~ thingie in file
> names, "DOS" (e.g., pre-NTFS Windows) could support long filenames.
>
> Does anyone still use an old version of PKZIP that won't support filenames
> longer than 8.3?
>
> Does anyone still run DOS the OS? (Meaning real, actual DOS -- like 5.0, etc.)
>
> --Todd
Please DO NOT start using long file names in the ldraw library. Everyone
(including me) who uses ledit will not be able to use those parts
properly.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
| (...) I can't remember the last time "dropping DOS support" came up, but it seems like a very long time ago! Is "real DOS" (not real-mode DOS :o) still really something that needs to be supported? I understand that DOS as a filesystem format needs (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
