Subject:
|
Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:30:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
783 times
|
| |
|
|
Carsten Schmitz wrote:
>
> > 3. One of the charters of all LDraw derivative work is that backwards
> > compatibility be maintained. This doesn't mean that new features that are
> > unsupported by LDraw/LEdit can't be added, but that they will continue to
> > properly handle models which are created with new tools. Consequently, all
> > filenames in the part library must remain 8.3, and all new features in dat
> > files must be implemented as comments.
>
> Sooner or later you will have to make concessions to this point of view
> because its not possible to ignore the growing numbers of new parts.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Carsten
Oh, you mean that a DOS directory is limited to a specific number of files? I recall that Norton Commander 5.0 for DOS
is limited to, I think it was 2000 files...
--
Tore Eriksson
Sweden
ICQ: 76066510
LEGO: MOC++++ FS,SP,TO++ TC+ LS YB@m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
| Hello Tore! (...) recall that Norton Commander 5.0 for DOS (...) No. FAT16 has only limitations in the root directory for maximum number of files. That NC was limited to 2000 files was a memory allocation problem. What I meant was: 1) The first (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
| Hello Travis, (...) That's no point. If the source of LDraw would be available it would be easy to implement long filename support... even in a DOS program. But... (...) ... if the source was never available my point if view has died. It was just a (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
