Subject:
|
Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 17:28:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
828 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
>
> > The issue is about the parts from the group "Train Track 4.5V".
>
> Why is it labeled "4.5V"? It works quite fine for 12V trains
> too (just to make sure we get a long discussion :-).
My 12V trains don't move when I put them on the 4.5V-only track :)
Now seriously, maybe we could drop the "4.5" from the name and replace
it with "old" but I don't think it's going to be a good idea. Of course
we'd have to keep the current format for the cross and points as the
4.5V and 12V versions are different.
> We might want to remember the 12V power tracks too.
I'm fine with the current names but if people want to change it, why
not call them "Train Power Track 12V" or "Train Track 12V Inside" ?
> Not a bad idea. What about "1st gen.", "2nd gen.", and "3rd
> gen."?
What's the 3rd generation ?
Leonardo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
| Leonardo: (...) Neither do mine. - But they don't move on the so-called 12V track either. :) (...) So am I (but then we can't discuss :). (...) Makes sense. (...) The stuff we mostly use for 9V trains. Actually I like to use 2nd and 3rd generation (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
| Manfred: (...) Why is it labeled "4.5V"? It works quite fine for 12V trains too (just to make sure we get a long discussion :-). (...) Yes. We might want to remember the 12V power tracks too. (...) Actually I distinguish between "unpowered", "12V", (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
