Subject:
|
Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 20:26:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1195 times
|
| |
|
|
Leonardo:
> My 12V trains don't move when I put them on the 4.5V-only track :)
Neither do mine. - But they don't move on the so-called 12V
track either. :)
> Now seriously, maybe we could drop the "4.5" from the name and replace
> it with "old" but I don't think it's going to be a good idea. Of course
> we'd have to keep the current format for the cross and points as the
> 4.5V and 12V versions are different.
>
> > We might want to remember the 12V power tracks too.
>
> I'm fine with the current names
So am I (but then we can't discuss :).
> but if people want to change it, why
> not call them "Train Power Track 12V" or "Train Track 12V Inside" ?
Makes sense.
> > Not a bad idea. What about "1st gen.", "2nd gen.", and "3rd
> > gen."?
>
> What's the 3rd generation ?
The stuff we mostly use for 9V trains. Actually I like to
use 2nd and 3rd generation power tracks together. Then all
my engines (4.5V, 9V, and 12V) can run in the same place
(there _are_ certain problems with this).
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
| (...) My 12V trains don't move when I put them on the 4.5V-only track :) Now seriously, maybe we could drop the "4.5" from the name and replace it with "old" but I don't think it's going to be a good idea. Of course we'd have to keep the current (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
