Subject:
|
Re: Track names (was Re: To Tore Eriksson)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 13:41:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
752 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> You could not find it with that loose and sloppy description! :-)
> http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=6761-1 Sorry about that!
> I have to confess that I have not actually looked closely at Bandit's
> secret Hideout, one copy is still in box in a lower bin layer and the
> other one got parted out as soon as it came home.
Don´t bother to dig the set up. Tore found an instuction scan at
http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/6000/6761/6761-07.jpg
and it clearly shows that the track parts from this set also have slots in
them.
Greetings, Manfred Moolhuysen.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Track parts naming scheme survey
|
| Hello all We have another fine naming issue on our hand, which is always good for a lively discussion tread :-) The issue is about the parts from the group "Train Track 4.5V". I believe two different types are known here: 1- the oldest "Blue" type (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Track names (was Re: To Tore Eriksson)
|
| (...) You could not find it with that loose and sloppy description! :-) (URL) Sorry about that! (...) You're right, slots are a better name than notches for the openings. However I would say that "tabs" are a better name for the part on the sleeper (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
