To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 3096
3095  |  3097
Subject: 
Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 13 Oct 1999 12:30:34 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@+nomorespam+novera.com
Viewed: 
1346 times
  
Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn wrote:
<snipped it again!>

Except I think you forgot the sleeper, or else I missed it. it's
neither  12v or 4.5v so it ought to be

Train Track Sleeper

or

Train Track Slotted Sleeper

but I'm not sure which.

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
 
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes: [Snipped] (...) Hmmm, hmmm, that might actually work, but I think it's just a tiny bit more complicated as you think. Please keep in mind that there are track parts implicitly intended for either the 4.5 V (...) (25 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

22 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR