Subject:
|
Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Oct 1999 12:26:44 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.!Spamcake!com
|
Viewed:
|
884 times
|
| |
|
|
Yes! Excellent compromise! It's got the key stuff up front and the fact
that not all parts are 4.5v specific or 9v specific comes out clearly.
Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn wrote:
<very nice work, all of which I snipped>
>
> Phew...:-)
I'll say! :-) Now say the entire list three times fast. Buy you a beer
if you can do it!
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes: [Snipped] (...) Hmmm, hmmm, that might actually work, but I think it's just a tiny bit more complicated as you think. Please keep in mind that there are track parts implicitly intended for either the 4.5 V (...) (25 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
