 | | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
|
(...) Gotcha. (...) Sure, but there are several non-hinged pieces that do have an axis of rotation (or pivoting, anyway), the ones coming to mind are: 2904.DAT Technic Motorcycle Pivot 2342.DAT Space Control Panel (needs work) Also, tons of pieces, (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
|
(...) c /hinged/rotating/ (...) Not really, just trying to clarify. (...) What's the axis of rotation for a 2x4 brick? (expected answer: "it doesn't have one") Steve (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Categories (was Re: Parts with odd angles)
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:378e19fb.710642...net.com... (...) Patterned bricks could be put in BrickPatterned. It's nice to have all those 1x1 bricks with lettern & numbers, but it's a pain getting past them to the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
|
(...) Yes. Or I could just add the functions to LDAO as a set of internal tools (like the inliner and outliner are). (...) That would be sad. (...) Would it help to replace (or enhance) the Tool Manager with a Tool Wizard, to walk people through the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
|
It wouldn't be too hard for utility writers to write code to add their tool to LDAO. They just need to add a few settings to c:\windows\ldraw.ini. Let's see here... First, they need to create a new section for their tool: [My LDraw Tool] (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Integrating help topics/tutorials on ldraw.org
|
|
(...) Great! (...) So you're saying have the OMR link to an OMR instruction page within /reference/? For the OMR only I was thinking have the pages under OMR in something like /repository/official...tructions/ so when someone goes to look at the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Categories (was Re: Parts with odd angles)
|
|
(...) Umm, the battery boxes and such *are* in electric. Are you looking at LDAO's VEC? You might want to hit the "restore default categories" option to capture the recent part-moves. It's a good idea to look at the Technic category and maybe move (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
|
(...) This is a troll, right? It's for every piece whose axis of rotation is not located at <0,0,0>. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
|
(...) That's for hinged pieces where the hinge's axis is not located at <0,0,0>, right? Steve (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
|
(...) Note that the angle and axis of rotation can be wrapped up nicely in a LDraw matrix -- suppose we supply this data as a preformatted matrix? Thus, a Technic Motorcycle Pivot Rotation Guide would be an LDraw line with the proper rotation matrix (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
|
(...) Okay. In order to pivot a piece, you need two pieces of information: the *angle* of rotation, and the *axis* of rotation. Given one, it's a little work to figure out the other. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
|
LDAO actually is quite good for adding utilities. It's not that hard a process, but it is an additional barrier. Having some of the most important utilities come "standard" with LDAO would be great. For example: I know that setting up L3P to work (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) What is the advantage of grouping OMR sets into pages based on theme/subtheme? I would think an organization system similar to Kevin Loch's would be fine. We (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
|
(...) Good point John. What about making LDAO plugin-based so people can write utilities for it and install them as plugins? This would allow for more than just MPD being integrated - people could use whatever util written in plugin format in LDAO. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
|
Steve (and authors of .MPD utilities), Could a utility to build and unpack .mpd files be integrated into LDAO? I fear that unless we make it as easy to create an .mpd file as it is to inline submodels, the .mpd format will not reach (almost) (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Integrating help topics/tutorials on ldraw.org
|
|
(...) oke, as I mentioned earlier, I want to contribute to the reference part of the lugnet-organisation and I do have some time in the next months. I think all manuals should be organized under references, with links from the corresponding sites. I (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: #3149 Plate 5x2 Hinge
|
|
How about that. Reply to your own mail :-) Jaco van der Molen <jmolen@globalxs.nl> wrote in message news:FEwsno.G15@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Webring translated
|
|
I think the items of the webring should be translated in our project aswel: LDraw Webring Join Agreement Ring FAQ Logo Selection HTML Code Help Ring Staff Dutch is ready... -- Greetingz... Sjaacko (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
|
(...) It makes sense on some parts, not on others. It would fit in well with the Technic Angle Connectors, not so well with the minifig drill. Speaking of the drill, something should be done with the minifig hand, which has an incorrect angle at the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts with odd angles
|
|
(...) What about removing some items from "Technic"? Like make some new categories, such as axles, beams, and gears? Personally I think the "Technic" category is to big and varied. Motors and battery boxes and such could go into electric, and misc. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
