Subject:
|
Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:54:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
943 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve (and authors of .MPD utilities),
Could a utility to build and unpack .mpd files be integrated into LDAO? I
fear that unless we make it as easy to create an .mpd file as it is to inline
submodels, the .mpd format will not reach (almost) universal acceptance.
With the OMR becoming a reality, it would really be a shame if all those
models had their submodels inlined rather than .mpd'ed.
I realize that even now, making .mpd's work only involves getting one of the
.mpd utilities and setting it up to work with LDAO, but this seems too much
for a large number of people.
-John Van
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
| (...) Good point John. What about making LDAO plugin-based so people can write utilities for it and install them as plugins? This would allow for more than just MPD being integrated - people could use whatever util written in plugin format in LDAO. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
| (...) Yes. Or I could just add the functions to LDAO as a set of internal tools (like the inliner and outliner are). (...) That would be sad. (...) Would it help to replace (or enhance) the Tool Manager with a Tool Wizard, to walk people through the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
