To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 2351
2350  |  2352
Subject: 
Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:51:15 GMT
Viewed: 
1125 times
  
LDAO actually is quite good for adding utilities.  It's not that hard a
process, but it is an additional barrier.  Having some of the most important
utilities come "standard" with LDAO would be great.

For example:  I know that setting up L3P to work with LDAO is quite simple--I
did it on my old PC and it worked great.  One button press created a .pov
file.  But since I got the new machine late last year, I haven't bothered to
figure out just what I did before, and have instead resorted to the DOS
command line (still pretty easy for L3P, but a waste anyway.)

I don't think it's reasonable to expect all utility authors to configure their
programs as plug-ins, but for the most-used ones it would be really nice.

-John Van

Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message
news:4.2.0.58.19990715111529.00a1e280@pop.osiriscomm.com...
At 10:54 AM 7/15/99 , John VanZwieten wrote:
Steve (and authors of .MPD utilities),

Could a utility to build and unpack .mpd files be integrated into LDAO?  I
fear that unless we make it as easy to create an .mpd file as it is to • inline
submodels, the .mpd format will not reach (almost) universal acceptance.

With the OMR becoming a reality, it would really be a shame if all those
models had their submodels inlined rather than .mpd'ed.

I realize that even now, making .mpd's work only involves getting one of • the
.mpd utilities and setting it up to work with LDAO, but this seems too much
for a large number of people.

Good point John.  What about making LDAO plugin-based so people can write
utilities for it and install them as plugins?  This would allow for more
than just MPD being integrated - people could use whatever util written in
plugin format in LDAO.

Anyways, I agree that LDAO should have a (rather advanced) MPD builder to
ease things.

-Tim <><

http://www.zacktron.com
AIM:   timcourtne
ICQ:   23951114

Get paid to surf the web!  Visit:
http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=DGO655




Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
 
(...) Good point John. What about making LDAO plugin-based so people can write utilities for it and install them as plugins? This would allow for more than just MPD being integrated - people could use whatever util written in plugin format in LDAO. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR