Subject:
|
Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Jul 1999 16:21:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
780 times
|
| |
|
|
At 11:51 AM 7/15/99 , John VanZwieten wrote:
> LDAO actually is quite good for adding utilities. It's not that hard a
> process, but it is an additional barrier. Having some of the most important
> utilities come "standard" with LDAO would be great.
Yep!
> I don't think it's reasonable to expect all utility authors to configure their
> programs as plug-ins, but for the most-used ones it would be really nice.
I'm not saying I expect it either, but to make it available and also for
the most used ones it would be wonderful.
And is there any chance someone could put LDLite and LDAO together with an
ledit-like editor and make a Windows LDraw? That would obviously be even
nicer if it integrated some of the most used tools...
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
Get paid to surf the web! Visit:
http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=DGO655
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Could MPeedy be integrated into LDAO?
|
| (...) Good point John. What about making LDAO plugin-based so people can write utilities for it and install them as plugins? This would allow for more than just MPD being integrated - people could use whatever util written in plugin format in LDAO. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
