 | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 w/ pattern, technic pin long w/ bush
|
|
(...) Jonathan, whether you understand what the complaints are about or not, just take it on faith that this part is _wrong_. As someone else said, if you would get this piece and actually look at it, you would clearly see the flaws. Right now, (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.org: Organization and look & feel
|
|
(...) That is sort of the de-facto "standard". Jorge Gonzalez (1) used this method for the sets he did, as have others. -- Terry K -- 1. Pretty sure it was JG. JG, sorry if I misspelled your name. (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
(...) sorry roy, but i have to disagree with you here... take a look at the 1x2 tile (3068)... simple, elegant, and as far as i'm concerned (especially after i went back and personally put in the bottom groove) it is *perfect*.. true, there isn't (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
(...) this line concerns me very *very* much. (...) as a matter of fact.. yes.... while you *should* be able to enjoy modeling things using the existing library of LDraw elements, if i had known all along that you are 100% sans lego i would have (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Uploading of large DAT files is still broken
|
|
(...) OK, with the new upload-watcher in place, I can say with complete certainty that uploading of large DAT files is still broken. Actually, uploading them is OK, but the part where they go into the newsserver is broken. But it's still a bug. The (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
Tim Courtney wrote in message (...) Oh, GIVE me a break. "Absolutely PERFECT". Ya gotta be kiddin'! No one, NO PART, is ABSOLUTELY PERFECT! Sheezz........ (...) Got me here. Ya gotta to earn it and there's a few here who need to step back and (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: electric technic micromotor top
|
|
(...) It would be helpful, Jonathan, if you noted exactly what it is that you modified, as well as why, and what part(s) of it still need work. --Todd (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | L3P support of extended metacommands?
|
|
Lars, I think I remember someone saying that L3P does or would support the extended Meta-commands of LDLite (ie, translate, rotates, etc.) Is that true? I could really use it for my X-Oid Mech which I just split apart into multiple dat files so that (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
|
(...) Dunno how Tim is set for getting academic prices on software, but I did note the other day that all of the current Macromedia web-oriented products (Flash, Fireworks, Dreamweaver) are $99 at our campus computer store. (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
|
Realized I didn't give an address for downloading it. Check out: (URL) need to fill out a form, but that's the spot to download. Ben -- Ben Vaughan buster@marsbase.com www.marsbase.com ---...--- The few, the proud,...the plastic. Ben Vaughan (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
|
Tim, All you need is Macromedia's Flash. They do offer a demo for download that has a 30 day limitation. The actual program costs something like $250.00 (US) I think. I'm going on memory here. As for how it works, think of a timeline. Everything (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
|
Tim Courtney wrote in message <199904102225.SAA274...et.com>... (...) I believe I have a cd with a list of shockwave files for web sites. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
(...) Yes, I also agree here. But do try with Lego in hand! Just don't push it on the group if it doesn't pan out for you. (...) Yes, truthfully, your public math class isn't gaining you many friends here. (...) Correct.... (...) Sounds like a good (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: technic pin long with stop bush
|
|
(...) This is true. Responsibility should be taken for parts. Jonathan, please don't flood the list with parts - work on one at a time until it is perfected and you have established some respect here. (...) LOL!! (...) I agree here. Due to the (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: technic pin long with stop bush
|
|
(...) Heh heh, oops. I meant "...that you put *your* name on." --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: pannel 2 x 6 x 6 with black grille pattern
|
|
(...) Whoever modeled the raw 2466.dat element did a fine job. The line pattern in this proposed 2466P07.DAT, however, is incorrect. Here are two photos of how it is supposed to look: (2 URLs) chance you didn't copy the pattern from 3068P07.DAT (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: space nose with V pattern
|
|
(...) That's not too bad. Here's a picture of what it's supposed to look like: (URL) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 w/ pattern, technic pin long w/ bush
|
|
(...) of (...) Huh? the pins fit just fine. However, you left a ring around the middle of your part which would never allow a technic beam to pass over it. (As insticking the pin through two technic beams at once) --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with computer screen and buttons pattern
|
|
(...) Yes, I have several. And I have a scanner. But I won't scan them for you until you have either shown us that you can do a good job on at least one other part first, or, alternatively, if you agree to focus on this part until you get it right, (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: technic pin long with stop bush
|
|
(...) You used the connect.dat primitive. It is not the right primitive for this part. I think you may have inherited this error from the 6558.dat and 4459.dat parts. In any case, it is customary in most development circles to take responsibility (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
