 | | Re: Question on part naming
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Since the dimensions matter with wedges -- a 3x4 wedge is going to be a different shape from a 4x3 wedge -- the order of dimensions in wedge names should be fixed by axis, not given in "smaller x larger" order. For slope bricks, (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Hello, I've made a common primitive for the click rotation socket parts. See (URL) of them share only the inner cogwheel. So I made a quarter of them. See (URL) I need a name (title) and a partname for that. Please make suggestions. So it's (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on part naming
|
|
(...) I was just surfing lego.com and came across the new tutorials. In one of the pages, a similar although much simpler question than yours was asked and answered. (URL) almost wanted to port you question for the experts at lego.com to answer. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Question on part naming
|
|
I noticed some inconsistancy in the naming of some of the wedge parts. Some are named with the smaller number first, and others are named with the numbers placed to match the numbers used on bricks based on the X and Z axes. For example, 41765 is (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
(...) (URL) Nope>. (22 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
(...) I was hoping that you'd somehow be able to get permission from TLC to use their logo-- it really makes the set image complete. I really think your work could be used as a valuable asset to the AFOL community and to TLC as well for that matter. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.models, David Laswell wrote: In this and/or similar cases, (...) they'd just send a request to Brickshelf (i.e. Kevin, since they (...) contacting individuals through their Brickshelf accounts) to (...) the problem would sort (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | 47468 2 x 1.5 x 2/3 Sloped and Curved with Flair
|
|
Peeron does not have this in inventory. It's found as a leg or arm armour on all the good knights in Knights Kingdom. How do I ask Peeron to include this part in their inventory? This is going to be a fun part to author! (22 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 47457 2 x 2 x 2/3 Two Top Studs, Curved Slope End [DAT]
|
|
What approach should I take to create the "Curved Slope End". Should I create a curved and slope line and surface primitive? The basis for this part file (version 2) is 41855 2 x 2 x 2/3 Slope Rounded. In the uploaded 47457v2.dat file, you'll see (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Bow-tie quads in BFC-certified parts
|
|
(Note that I'm sending followups to the lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw newsgroup alone, because that seems to be the appropriate group, but I think the audience of the lugnet.cad.dat.parts group should see this.) In the process of testing my next major (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
(...) Illegal? No, you can't be arrested or assigned a preset fine for using the LEGO logo. That's a trademark violation, not a crime. They could sue you, if you're dumb enough to push things that far. In this and/or similar cases, more likely (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
"Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> wrote in news:I3sI5w.4qu@lugnet.com: (...) Actually, after thinking it over, I suppose using the logo might make it seem like they are officially released pictures by TLC. I'm going to remove the logo and (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
(...) Excellent suggestion. jacob.mckee@HOTDEATH...a.lego.com (ignore my editorial caps:-) Drop him a line. I think it would be cool to have them integrated into the Brickshelf instructions somehow-- if nothing more than a link. Brickshelf, BTW, has (...) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Ah, I see! I'm observing a Knight at the moment. 48171 and 48170 represent the two ways that the cup-shaped cogged sub-part is rotated. Shoulder and hip joints are the same as 48170. Elbow and knees are like 48171. The one slightly different (...) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
(...) Our opinions don't matter as much as LEGO opinions do, in my opinion. You could always ask Jake to get you a favorable ruling... Thanks again for sharing these, whatever the final outcome may be. (22 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
"Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> wrote in news:I3sI5w.4qu@lugnet.com: (...) Since I'm using virtual Lego bricks to 'build' these renders, I wanted to put the Lego name somewhere in the pictures. Since I'd be doing that, I thought it was just (...) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
(...) Not if he secured permission (which he probably didn't). TLC would be within their rights to have him remove their logo, but I wouldn't be surprised if TLC let it slide. His work is obviously fantastic and is only a positive reflection upon (...) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
Great work! But... isn't the use of the LEGO logo illegal? Jaco "John" <John@TCLTC.org> schreef in bericht news:I3p0MC.1LLy@lugnet.com... (...) on (...) (URL) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) The cogs weren't the problem. The problem ist the junction between the primitive and the part. Where does the primitive end and where does the part begins? Not every part has the same junction to the primitive. For example: The rotation-offset (...) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Huummm, I'll see if my Lego Camera can do some justice to the click-rotation parts. Otherwise, I'm going to have to wait till I can get back to the Portland State University Media Lab. I'm looking into the part at 10x and the wavy cogs on (...) (22 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
