Subject:
|
Re: Question on part naming
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:22:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3637 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> I noticed some inconsistancy in the naming of some of the wedge parts. Some
> are named with the smaller number first, and others are named with the
> numbers placed to match the numbers used on bricks based on the X and Z axes. • [snip]
> Then we have parts 43712 and 43713, which are both currently on the tracker.
> 43712 uses the 4x6 naming scheme, and 43713 uses the 6x4 naming scheme. Since
> they are complementary parts, their names really need to match. So which
> naming scheme is correct?
Since the dimensions matter with wedges -- a 3x4 wedge is going to be a
different shape from a 4x3 wedge -- the order of dimensions in wedge names
should be fixed by axis, not given in "smaller x larger" order. For slope
bricks, the dimensions are always Z x X. Wedges should follow the precedent of
slopes.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Question on part naming
|
| I noticed some inconsistancy in the naming of some of the wedge parts. Some are named with the smaller number first, and others are named with the numbers placed to match the numbers used on bricks based on the X and Z axes. For example, 41765 is (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
