To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 845
844  |  846
Subject: 
Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad, lugnet.build
Date: 
Wed, 3 Mar 1999 04:34:04 GMT
Viewed: 
39 times
  
Terry Keller writes:
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:44:52 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote:

On Mon, 1 Mar 1999 07:13:49 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K)
wrote:

It sure will be nice when there are POV-Ray primitives for the cone pieces,
eh?

BTW, you did see Lars reply to my question about L3P and the conic
sections, right?  So after the next update to L3P, you'll put the fix
for the 1x1 cone into the following parts update, right?

Affirmative to both.  Though, to be safe, you might want to prod my memory
when
the time comes.

Okey-doke.

Question, do the other cones have that problem?

The problem is with the primitive being used.  I used the 1-4con3.dat file,
the translation of which is improperly written by L3P.  Presumably, any part
using this primitive will render incorrectly.  Currently, there's only one:
6267.dat, the windscreen 2 x 12 x 4.

I don't know if any other primitives have this problem.  Maybe 1-4con4.dat (it
was added at the same time as 1-4con3.dat).

Steve



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
 
(...) I checked this part with L3P this morning. What I got was: (...) I can't find an error in these lines, except they zero out the y component to turn a conic into a ring. Does POV-Ray not work with this type of transformation matrix? (or: did I (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
  Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
 
(...) Good answer, but not the one I was looking for. :-) What I meant to ask is: do the current cones need to get the same/similar fix as the 1x1 cone? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
 
(...) Affirmative to both. Though, to be safe, you might want to prod my memory when the time comes. Question, do the other cones have that problem? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)

41 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR