Subject:
|
Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:32:09 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
5897 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.admin.terms, Matthew Miller writes:
> > "I desperately need a few 2x4x3 flibber-globbits (any color) for • spaceship
> > I'm working on. If you've got some, check out my post in .market.bst."
> >
> > Ok in .space?
>
> I can only speak for myself here, I'd find that extremely annoying, if • that's
> all the post said -- especially without a more explicit pointer to the • other
> list. Yet, even with a more explicit pointer, it wouldn't sound any • different
> to me as a reader than the actual other post to .b-s-t would have.
Gotta agree with Todd here, but a counter example which is probably ok is
something like the following:
: Check out http://this.isnt.a/real/url for pictures of the huge castle I
: built using parts from the 10 copies of 6097 that I just bought. I
: especially liked how I <*snip*> yada yada yada
:
: By the way, check out
http://www.lugnet.com/market/buy-sell-trade/?n=999999999
: for my list of parts from these sets that I didn't use (especially those
red
: arched windows).
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
| (...) I can only speak for myself here, I'd find that extremely annoying, if that's all the post said -- especially without a more explicit pointer to the other list. Yet, even with a more explicit pointer, it wouldn't sound any different to me as a (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
