Subject:
|
Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Apr 2000 04:36:57 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
5157 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Kevin Bannister writes:
> Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote:
>
> > Now, by your own estimation, MOST people frown on non-auction solicitations.
> > And yet they're ok.
>
> Auctions create a lot more traffic than regular sales. At least thats
> what I've always thought was the reason (it's the reason why I don't
> read RTL anymore, anyway). They clutter up a newsgroup. Maybe Todd
> feels the same way?
Not really. Seller run auctions create more traffic because of the constant
updates, but ebay auction announcements are usually a single or 2 shot deal.
Many B-S-T posts fall in that level of traffic. Yet, many people seem to
dislike ebay auction announcements more than private auction announcements, so
again, it looks like a prejudice. B-S-T is good, auction is bad. Seller run
auction is good auction, ebay auction is bad auction. Definite double
standard.
Mike Poindexter
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
| (...) Auctions create a lot more traffic than regular sales. At least thats what I've always thought was the reason (it's the reason why I don't read RTL anymore, anyway). They clutter up a newsgroup. Maybe Todd feels the same way? (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
