Subject:
|
Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:48:11 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
4985 times
|
| |
|
|
<snipped much text that I completely agree with>
In lugnet.admin.terms, Mike Stanley writes:
> I just don't think there should be a
> difference - solicitation is solicitation is solicitation.
Precisely.
I dislike seeing b-s-t posts in theme-NGs just as much as I dislike auction
posts (1).
I'd be happy to add anything, but Mike said it all.
-Shiri
(1) I do not completely dislike them, but I DO prefer to see them only when
*I* want to see them, and then I go to .market.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
| (...) messages (...) aren't (...) I keep being amused in a confused kind of way by this seeming double standard. Let me demonstrate how this bst vs auction double standard sounds to me. Some (maybe a lot, maybe just a few really "valuable") people (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
