To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 49
48  |  50
Subject: 
Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:52:14 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
5723 times
  
In lugnet.admin.terms, Mike Stanley writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Todd Lehman writes:
> > That's not actually true.  Only auctions are verboten outside of the .market
> > .auction group by the Terms of Use Agreement.  Non-auction solicitations
> > aren't strictly verboten by the Agreement, but generally they're frowned
> > upon by most people.
> 
> I keep being amused in a confused kind of way by this seeming double
> standard.  Let me demonstrate how this bst vs auction double standard sounds
> to me. • <snipped bits>
> Why is that?  I personally don't care to see either outside of the .market
> tree.  I would say that *I* equally frown on auction and non-auction
> solicitations.  What would I (or anyone else) have to do as a LUGNET member to
> convince the PTB (you) that we'd rather not see non-auction solicitations
> other than in the .market tree?
> 
> I'm not trying to be overly argumentative, and I don't want to change the rule
> as it pertains to auction postings.  I just don't think there should be a
> difference - solicitation is solicitation is solicitation.  It just seems a
> little silly that a rule was set in stone to benefit the wishes and likes of
> some nebulous group concerning auction postings but there is no rule to limit
> things that, by your own admission, "most" people don't like.  Most seems to
> quantify a significant enough interest in considering making them verboten as
> well.

I generally try to avoid "me too" posts, but wanted to do so here, and add
some reasoning.

I agree with Mike.  My personal preference is to not see any market traffic
unless I go looking for it.(1)  Also, if the double standard didn't exist, and
there were a single rule for market postings, it would go a long way to
eliminating gray area.

$0.02
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
I'm getting paid for this --> alladvantage.com
Sign up via me, the reference $$ go to fund Lugnet.

1:One of the reasons I don't watch TV much.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
 
(...) I disagree that there is a "double-standard" (but that's just wording), but I agree that it would go a long way toward eliminating gray areas -- if the boundaries could be defined clearly (which I'm very skeptical of). Some things to figure (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) ! 

Message is in Reply To:
  auction vs non-auction double standard?
 
(...) messages (...) aren't (...) I keep being amused in a confused kind of way by this seeming double standard. Let me demonstrate how this bst vs auction double standard sounds to me. Some (maybe a lot, maybe just a few really "valuable") people (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) ! 

20 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR