Subject:
|
Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:46:49 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@saynotospamMATTDM.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
5426 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote:
> I read .castle to read castle stuff. I don't WANT to read about someone
> selling anything there - period. I would wager that *I* don't want to read
> that just as much as the people who don't want to read auction stuff.
For the record, I agree with Mike on this one.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
| (...) I think there is, and I chose that word/phrase because I thought it would indicate that it is a potentially charged issue. People are forbidden to post auctions to any group but .market.auction. People can post "I'm selling this ..." messages (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
