 | | Re: Brickshelf Find, and Insulting other people's friend's
|
|
(...) Egad. (URL) Time flies> JOHN (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mr. Jeeves
|
|
(...) Perhaps a determining factor is who potentially stands to profit from the announcement-- the poster or the reader. (...) The key word is "implication". In this instance, his solicitation was in no uncertain terms-- the very reason for the (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf Find, and Insulting other people's friend's
|
|
(...) I find nothing wrong with Soren as a role model, and thank him for showing me how to make a mech. I'm well aware of the public facets of his character, and being 18, am quite self-posessed enough to choose what I allow to influence me. Do no (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) I understand, Stefan. And I am sorry if I came down on you too hard. In light of your action, my faith in you is now restored:-) Leg Godt, JOHN (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mr. Jeeves
|
|
(...) John- Are these "for sale" posts to be forbidden too? Every time someone posts a description of a new LEGO set including its price and specifying the first day of sale and even saying where to buy it? (Hmmm, let's also eliminate those Shop @ (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) I never said it was an excuse. I was only offering an explanation to John. -Stefan- (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) Luckily you have left yourself the option of removing or changing the images outside of Lugnet. Not having read the TOS is not really an excuse (a reason maybe), ignorance of the law does not give you carte blanche to break it. Tim (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: (was Brickshelf find:) DON'T STEAL PEOPLE'S IMAGES
|
|
(...) Corny! You corn ball. Take the time for me, there's that axe again. Soren, buddy, pal, neighbor, peer, dude, if Stefan looks up to you, this is the time to show him the error of his way. Bafoon! Not take time to dual with your arch nemesis. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) Not at all. Kev moderates 1,000s of images-- things do sneak through. (...) Examples? Without disciplinary action? (...) It's not my intention to button-push, but merely to point out that vulgar language is becoming more and more commonplace, (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) lol Okaay, wrong guy to ask:-) (...) Thanks for the offer, but that isn't really my cup of tea. (...) Well, there's a fair chance the builder doesn't even speak English... (...) Really. And what do you suppose it is? (...) Honestly, I have no (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) Actually, they're covered under fair use. The parody/satire clause, IIRC. (...) Because I'm not interested in a shitstorm. (...) I'd laugh my ass off. Besides, I've done far (URL) worse> (warning, really messed up adult content) than that (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
Moving back to admin.terms since this is not an off topic debate. The images do not *clearly* violate TOS if they have been moderated. Considering the size and obviousness of the lettering, it can't be argued that the admins didn't see it, and as (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) But aren't those types of edits the right of the creator alone? (...) Why not? (...) No "crime", but put it this way: how would you feel if somebody posted pics of their recreation of (URL) with a lewd caption on it? You might think it's (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) From the TOS: "You agree to not use the Service to: (a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
Which secion of the TOS do those images specifically violate? Perhaps I'm missing it, but I didn't see any that those were *clearly* in violation of. Jeff (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
I'm not going to take issue with the rest of this, but stolen? I think Stefan's edits, if anything, highlight the expressive quality of the poses. I wouldn't have posted them, myself, but I don't think they're some kind of crime. Soren (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) Fine fine, do you really need me or anyone to tell you what you did was not cool? No respect for the builder's copy written photos. No respect for the Terms of Service for Brickshelf, Maj.com, or Lugnet. No meaningful comment on the model (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) There is no need to apologize for having fun. That is why we are all here. But it is important that necessary we all have fun playing by the rules. That is what "leg godt" is all about. Some folks are a little more sensitive to "colorful" (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) If you thought it was funny, why reply with criticism? (...) Who says I don't? Soren, for example, is one of my favorite builders, and a person I look up to and admire and turn to for tutelage (is that even a word?), and in fact those are his (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) In fact, it is a direct violation of the TOS. I would suggest that the post be cancelled. Even the images are TOS violations of Maj.com. Conduct such as this is highly unbecoming and very disappointing, Stefan. JOHN (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
|
(...) -snip- That's pretty funny. However, please respect the work of other builders. I am sure this model took hours of hard work for Hiron to create. Did you get the builder's permission to re-post their work? Also, please do not post profanity on (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) -snip- May I ask if these rules are still being honored? Or are the members of this forum prey to dogs and trolls? I have several complaints. Paid Member #1051 (19 years ago, 21-Sep-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about a call for a contest
|
|
(...) Hi all: I know that some of the names have changed in the interim, but I wondered if I might re-raise this question. Specifically, the question is as follows: If I call for a contest adhering to an official theme (say, Blacktron) but (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Review Committee chartered for the LUGNET Policies and Procedures document
|
|
(...) Indeed. Classic-Castle played an excellent one this year. Re-did the whole site in a Classic Space motif. Great fun. But I'm not sure any of these sites had posted an April Fools joke by trying to hide it in policy changes/stuff. I know (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Review Committee chartered for the LUGNET Policies and Procedures document
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) Well, I do now feel a bit of a goose for thinking it was. I thought there were many clues in the post, but it turned out I was entirely wrong. (...) No, there hasn’t been such a case to my knowledge. However, I point out that in (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Review Committee chartered for the LUGNET Policies and Procedures document
|
|
(...) Jan-Albert van Ree - NL (...) A Policies and Procedures document has been drafted by the LUGNET (note the capitalization) Admin Team, as we said we would in the post I referenced. It has been given to the Review Committee that we chartered. (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Review Committee chartered for the LUGNET Policies and Procedures document
|
|
(...) ... (...) That's not an answerable question. I don't know why Lar included names of countries, but let's not make it into an issue. As for the truth vs. spoof, even I don't know. (20 years ago, 4-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Review Committee chartered for the LUGNET Policies and Procedures document
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) I've been waiting for a couple of days for someone to jump out from behind a tree and yell "Gotcha!"... ...but that hasn't happened, so I guess it isn't an April Fools joke after all. Which leaves me wondering, do the six named (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Review Committee chartered for the LUGNET Policies and Procedures document
|
|
As mentioned (URL) here>, the LUGNET administration team has been working on a Policies and Procedures document (sometimes called the P&P for short) that will help clarify to everyone what the various roles and responsibilities related to LUGNET (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about a call for a contest
|
|
(...) Excellent! Thanks for the response and for giving my question a thorough going-over. I appreciate whatever answer you Admin folks come back with, sometime between April and June. Dave! (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about a call for a contest
|
|
(...) Good questions, Dave! I've raised this with the Admin team... We'll mull this over and get back to you with an answer with our usual alacrity(1)... this contest doesn't start for a month or two I hope?(1) ++Lar XFUT to just .terms 1 - that's (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Question about a call for a contest
|
|
Not sure in which .admin forum this belongs; please FUT as appropriate. I'd like to call for a simple contest involving clone bricks and I wondered if it would be appropriate to make announce it in .build.contests, in .build.mecha, in .announce, in (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
(...) Thanks for thinking of me. :) It's an oversight. Mostly these days I'm busy with the new baby and with work, but I'm also keeping the lugnet servers up to date and helping with the administrative issues when I get a chance. As things calm (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
(...) Clarification: Matt Miller is on this list, but doesn't appear on the admin.general sidebar, is there a reason for that, or is it just an oversight? ROSCO (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) And, whereas I agree with you that no one is immune to theToS of LUGNET, please show where Larry violated that in the specific wording of his post. Again, just becaouse you don't like what was said, doesn't mean what was said violates the ToS. (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) Sorry but being an administrator means you should be a step above the crowd in terms of you behavior. Just be cause you are taking the moment off doesn’t mean the standards should be lowered. To (Loosely) quote the Policy update “They are not (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Ken Nagel wrote: <snip> (...) Whereas I think I can see both sides of this issue, 1- Larry wasn't posting as an admon, he was posting as a user of LUGNET, justlike the rest of us, and 2- by the very fact that he mentioned o.t.fun (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org.niltc, lugnet.org.us.clb, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
On Tuesday the 18th I extended a simple invitation for people to Visit NILTC’s next show: (URL) was responded to by Larry Pieniazek, The curator for lugnet.trains thus: (URL) copy came from the library who is very excited about this show. I would (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org.niltc, lugnet.org.us.clb, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) This sort of highlights something that I wonder about. Are smaller, out-of-the way groups more suitable for otherwise questionable behavior? With things like off-topic.debate, it's skipped by default, so there's less chance that (say) a kid (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Frank Filz wrote: <snip> (...) No! There's no one here like that!! We're all one big happy family! ;) Dave K (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
