Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:58:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8796 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Soren Roberts wrote:
| |
I’m not going to take issue with the rest of this, but stolen? I think
Stefan’s edits, if anything, highlight the expressive quality of the poses.
|
But aren’t those types of edits the right of the creator alone?
| |
I wouldn’t have posted them, myself,
|
Why not?
| |
but I don’t think they’re some kind of
crime.
|
No “crime”, but put it this way: how would you feel if somebody posted pics of
their recreation of
this with a lewd caption on it? You might think it’s hilarious, OR you might
be deeply offended. The point is, the poster doesn’t really care what you
think. That’s disrespectful, and it’s bad form, that’s all. And I think that
you might even agree, having said that you wouldn’t have posted them yourself.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
| (...) Actually, they're covered under fair use. The parody/satire clause, IIRC. (...) Because I'm not interested in a shitstorm. (...) I'd laugh my ass off. Besides, I've done far (URL) worse> (warning, really messed up adult content) than that (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
| I'm not going to take issue with the rest of this, but stolen? I think Stefan's edits, if anything, highlight the expressive quality of the poses. I wouldn't have posted them, myself, but I don't think they're some kind of crime. Soren (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
92 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
