Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:26:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8920 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, Soren Roberts wrote:
| |
I’m not going to take issue with the rest of this, but stolen? I think
Stefan’s edits, if anything, highlight the expressive quality of the poses.
|
But aren’t those types of edits the right of the creator alone?
|
Actually, they’re covered under fair use. The parody/satire clause, IIRC.
| |
| |
I wouldn’t have posted them, myself,
|
Why not?
|
Because I’m not interested in a shitstorm.
| |
| |
but I don’t think they’re some kind of
crime.
|
No “crime”, but put it this way: how would you feel if somebody posted pics
of their recreation of
this with a lewd caption on it?
|
I’d laugh my ass off. Besides, I’ve done far
worse (warning, really
messed up adult content) than that myself - if they can top it, my hat’s off to
them.
In fact, open challenge, right now - if you can do something funnier and more
lewd than that in the next 24 hours, I’ll apologize on Stefan’s behalf.
| |
You might think it’s hilarious, OR you
might be deeply offended. The point is, the poster doesn’t really care
what you think. That’s disrespectful, and it’s bad form, that’s all.
|
That can be said of any parody or satire - and until we hear from the builder, I
don’t think you should be making a value judgment in their place.
| |
And
I think that you might even agree, having said that you wouldn’t have posted
them yourself.
|
I wouldn’t post them because I don’t see the need to give people like you a
reason to screw their rectums a notch tighter.
Seems to me like you have an axe to grind - you mind taking that somewhere else?
I hear JLUG is the place for drama these days.
Soren
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
| (...) lol Okaay, wrong guy to ask:-) (...) Thanks for the offer, but that isn't really my cup of tea. (...) Well, there's a fair chance the builder doesn't even speak English... (...) Really. And what do you suppose it is? (...) Honestly, I have no (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
| (...) But aren't those types of edits the right of the creator alone? (...) Why not? (...) No "crime", but put it this way: how would you feel if somebody posted pics of their recreation of (URL) with a lewd caption on it? You might think it's (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
92 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
