 | | Re: Castle Lego for sale!!!
|
|
(...) It's been a while so I'll repeat my mantra.... <soapbox> Auctions are certainly not allowed outside of lugnet.market.auction (and at least one lugnet.org group), but the rules have not yet changed (unless Todd stealth changed them) to disallow (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Category Two Space Contest Entry: Photon Shuttle
|
|
(...) Actually, you don't have to include your title if you're posting on your own a personal note, if you don't want to. It's only required by the T&C when you post on behalf of LEGO as an employee or representative of LEGO. (See #15 & #16 in the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Please don't solicit people that report sales
|
|
I'm backing out of this discussion because I don't want it to get out of hand. I'm happy that the issue has been raised, Todd has made a simple change discouraging the behavior, and suggestions were made so that I can further discourage the behavior (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Please don't solicit people that report sales
|
|
(...) I didn't say he was going to, in fact, I read his note. My only point was that there isn't really any need to worry about the T&C becoming more restrictive, for two reasons: First, it's not Lugnet's place to worry about email that may be sent (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Please don't solicit people that report sales
|
|
(...) Todd isn't going to, though. He is just making a courteous note requesting people not to solicit unless they specify they are willing to [pick up sets or whatever]. -Shiri XFUT .admin.terms (but I hope there isn't too much discussion about (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Sales for 1980's castle and space models
|
|
Hi, Larry Pieniazek. I always found your name in Lugnet. Last time I had posted this title/subject on Lugnet, Todd has remind me. If I did not make mistake. From this Monday onward, I have stopped to do it. Even if notice for my private sales of (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Sales for 1980's castle and space models
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Eng Wee Lean writes: Disclaimer: I ain't the admin here, just some galoob that hangs out here more than he should. What I say ain't definitive, that's for Todd. But I bet I'm mostly right in what I say below, as I am usually (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: So did you wonder about me?
|
|
"Jake McKee" <jacob.mckee@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:G3oBzE.5yt@lugnet.com... (...) Glad to hear it! (...) actually (...) address. Understandable. (...) Note - you may want to develop a signature with your title at TLC in it, similar to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Building manual on sale.
|
|
(...) Todd, Are you going to finalize the change in TOS limiting all market activity to appropriate groups, or finalize that you won't be making the change? I hate to see people keep tripping over the TOS. Everyone else, I strongly suggest you read (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
(...) I think you're right -- removing it may be best, and I wouldn't miss it if it were gone. It doesn't get used often, and it would do just as well to give an email link there. As to its purpose/intention, it just happened to be an easy thing to (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
(...) I had hoped for a straight yes or no on each point, but never mind. Scott A (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
(...) I think it's a pretty strong implication that when you say "privately" that the contents won't normally be revealed... (...) I'm not sure I agree, actually... Again, it's a pretty strong implication. I think (despite some comments by others (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
(...) What do you think? (...) You could infer that. (...) That would be a stretch. --Todd (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
(...) I had a look at the feedback page: (URL) Questions: 1. Does one have to read the terms / agree to the terms / be a member / to post feedback? 2. Does line "here is your chance to share some thoughts privately" at least imply the communication (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Spam alert!
|
|
(...) my (...) while (...) Unfortunately, such people are unlikely to take any notice of such conditions. And any legal action against them is probably doomed to failure, and will certainly be expensive. The best two solutions are probably: 1. Never (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Spam alert!
|
|
(...) That's pretty sick. Is there any way Todd could add a terms of use for the LUGNET website for everyone -- members, non-members who post, and people who neither post nor are members?? That way he could legally forbid email address harvesting (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: blowharding (was: Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) I just noticed that - and I do recall seeing him posting for at least a few weeks here. He's been very respectful up until now, even on things that he has attacked the most today. Strange. ...perhaps he didn't fill a perscription or something (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: blowharding (was: Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
|
|
(...) into (...) <insert voice of moderation> Well, Matthew Moulton has been, IMO and in the apparant majority of opinions, a jerk today. *BUT* If you search back, you'll notice that he's been an infrequent, generally reasonable poster for upwards (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Was M*ndroid ToSsable from Lugnet? When?
|
|
(...) M*ndroid was probably a much clearer case. Matthew Moulton's case is a lot fuzzier, I think. Maybe tomorrow he wakes up and realizes he was having a bad day, and grows up, and apologizes, and stops posting off-topic in .space. Or maybe not. I (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Was M*ndroid ToSsable from Lugnet? When?
|
|
I came on the LEGO scene too late to "enjoy" (sic) the subject contributor's "contributions" (sic) to RTL. My question is this, to people that remember his posts, were they, in and of themselves, sufficient to get him ToSsed from Lugnet, were he to (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: skip filter settings?
|
|
(...) that (...) Me too. (URL) Todd has indicated it would be some rather tricky coding. Just ToS him... ++Lar (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: skip filter settings?
|
|
(...) A lovely and elegant idea. I hope it can be done. JohnG, GMLTC LUGNET member #38 (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...
|
|
(...) Given this bit of (rather unsurprising) information, is there any chance of enforcing something in the ToS to make this person go away? If not, is there any chance of adding something to the ToS to make it easier to make people like this go (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: offline building instructions...
|
|
(...) [...] (...) LOL! Sorry for the wasted bandwith, but this made me spew Dew all over my wife's iMac! (And it's Strawberry....) as evah, John C. (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: offline building instructions...
|
|
(...) KL (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: offline building instructions...
|
|
(...) Cool! Welcome to LUGNET, the friendliest place on the internet. Just watch out for certain characters who have unrealistic expectations of how fast TLC can change. If one of them challenges you, my advice is to ignore him or her. So, what's a (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: offline building instructions...
|
|
(...) Whoops! I meant #15, not #14. (Thanks, Jenn!) (...) You're welcome, and thank you for the quick corrective action. If you could help others become more aware of this, that would be great! --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: offline building instructions...
|
|
(...) Todd, This is a terrible oversight on my part and I apologize for not having read the Terms of Agreement more clearly. In this and in all future posts, I shall clearly identify myself and my relationship with LEGO. Thank you for pointing out (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: offline building instructions...
|
|
(...) Kiernan, Please re-read the LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement[1], specifically point #14 of the Discussion Group Terms and Conditions... You are certainly welcome to post here using a .lego.com address, but your posts must each include your title, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Linking to LUGNET image files?
|
|
(...) That is absolutely correct. I don't mind direct linking to anything on the website. The bandwidth from direct linking is very small compared with the overall traffic. Specifically, the scan library is a community resource so you should feel (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
(...) Todd, we seem to have returned to this problem again. We still don't have clear rules which indicate that it is wrong to list "these items available for straight sale for 2-3 weeks before I auction them". It seems to me that this is a (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Linking to LUGNET image files?
|
|
(...) Forget it. Use the images on www.brickset.com . Huw, who runs the site, does not mind as long as you give him mention by linking to his site. He also offers pictures of the figures in most sets so that one can use them too... I do. See here (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
I was not trying to advertise my auction. If you look at the site you will see that I have current auctions on which I did not mention. I have got over 100 sets which are listed to sell which is why I put the comment on buy-sell- trade. I will try (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
maybe, but the subject line is confusing (now that i re-read it, i see what you're saying, but the first time... not so much) (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
I read this as "You have 2-3 weeks before I sell this stuff elsewhere. Get it while you can." Not as an auction announcement. The site does list sets (at least Technic sets) for sale at a specific price. I see this as for-sale. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
(...) Alison, Are you trying to sneak an auction announcement into the .buy-sell-trade group or was this just an accidental oversight? Please re-read the LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement if you are confused: (URL) please re-read the second sentence of (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces)
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) For the record, this is not true. The people you see posting using handles are *not* violating the terms of service, which say: (do not) Post using a pseudonym, alias, screen-name, handle, alter-ego, meno, or any other type of (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Linking to LUGNET image files?
|
|
[reposted with typo corrections] (...) If it's from the Partsref, any direct image links to the GIFs are OK (and I think it specifically says that it's OK there and shows how to write the URL). If it's from the sets database, there's a mechanism in (...) (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
