| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> <insert voice of moderation>
>
> Well, Matthew Moulton has been, IMO and in the apparant majority of opinions,
> a jerk today.
>
> *BUT* If you search back, you'll notice that he's been an infrequent,
> generally reasonable poster for upwards of 6 months. His track record on
> usenet is bad, but ultimately that isn't his track record here - although it
> should be taken into consideration. Other people have (again, IMO) been
> ruder, or less considerate, without a call to block them from service - they
> just haven't been as rude in as short a time.
I just noticed that - and I do recall seeing him posting for at least a few
weeks here. He's been very respectful up until now, even on things that he
has attacked the most today. Strange.
...perhaps he didn't fill a perscription or something ... ;-)
> If he continues to post in the same vein, then yes, I think he should be
> ToSed - he's being obviously disruptive, and that falls under point 5 of the
> Terms of Use.
Yep. I think that he has already crossed that line, though.
> But if he apologizes, or even just stops being a jerk, then he should be left
> to his own devices, such as they are(1).
If, and only if.
> James
>
> 1:Like Todd, I guess I'm just not impartial enough to get around someone's
> personal offensiveness to see the inner greatness of their models.
Neither am I. I can appreciate his workmanship on his models, but his ego
(read his AIM conversation and his hate list) and his attitude on Lugnet sucks
major ____. IMO from his actions, he doesn't have a tremendous amount of
leeway, or right to be here.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
