To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9890
9889  |  9891
Subject: 
Administration, not moderation (was Re: for the eyes of Suz)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 26 Dec 2001 20:00:14 GMT
Viewed: 
268 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Steve Bliss writes:
In lugnet.admin.general, Kyle Beatty wrote:

The dangers generated by
thoughtful, well-intentioned moderaters, curates and the like are much more
alarming than the very occasional breaches of etiquette that happen here.

Please note: there has been *no* intention/proposal to introduce
moderators, or moderated newsgroups, on LUGNET.  And, as I understand
Suzanne's and Todd's opinions, there never will be.

...and also please understand that no one is asking for moderated content.
That would be a huge step in the wrong direction, IMHO, and totally against
the spirit of Lugnet.

What I (and others, I believe) want is for someone on the admin team to put
time into the news groups.  At one point early on, when there was more
enthusiasm, and Lugnet was a new exciting thing, Todd typically performed
this role.  If someone posted a question to admin.*, it tended to get an
answer. A debate in .admin about some obscure TOS point would have Todd
participate.  The TOS were updated if necessary. If someone posted an
auction announcement in the wrong place, the error was gently pointed out.
Posts that were horribly off-topic or overly harsh-languaged were given a
similar gentle note; not every time, but often enough to curb excessive TOS
violations, and keep things mostly civil and compartmentalized.

I am concerned that with *nothing* of this sort happening, Lugnet is slowly
sliding into "anything goes" territory.  Not all that long ago, there was a
post that was basically 90% foul language, and it gendered zero notice from
authority, even though it was brought to administrative attention.
Actually, that's not entirely fair; the post is canceled now, which may well
mean admin noticed it and it was dealt with off-line.  But regardless, it
*looks* like nothing was done, which gives the impression that no one with
authority is enforcing the rules.

thanks,

James



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
(...) Please note: there has been *no* intention/proposal to introduce moderators, or moderated newsgroups, on LUGNET. And, as I understand Suzanne's and Todd's opinions, there never will be. Kyle, I'm very interested to learn more about the dangers (...) (23 years ago, 26-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

15 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR