General Discussions about LUGNET : 9889


Administrative / General / 9889	9888 \| 9890

Subject:	Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Wed, 26 Dec 2001 16:55:12 GMT
Viewed:	271 times

In lugnet.admin.general, Kyle Beatty wrote: > The dangers generated by > thoughtful, well-intentioned moderaters, curates and the like are much more > alarming than the very occasional breaches of etiquette that happen here. Please note: there has been *no* intention/proposal to introduce moderators, or moderated newsgroups, on LUGNET. And, as I understand Suzanne's and Todd's opinions, there never will be. Kyle, I'm very interested to learn more about the dangers you see from curators. Could you expand on your prior message? Steve

Message has 1 Reply:

		Administration, not moderation (was Re: for the eyes of Suz)
(...) ...and also please understand that no one is asking for moderated content. That would be a huge step in the wrong direction, IMHO, and totally against the spirit of Lugnet. What I (and others, I believe) want is for someone on the admin team (...) (23 years ago, 26-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
(...) <snipped - but see the earlier message for some interesting thoughts> (...) More brick, less hand-wringing about community. The dangers generated by thoughtful, well-intentioned moderaters, curates and the like are much more alarming than the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

15 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search