 | | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
Hmmm...mmm, Well I can't say I agree totally with everything being said here; I know I haven't been here as long as most of you, but I'll reply nonetheless. I still view LUGNET as the center of the lego universe, I come here everyday, read lot's, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) Here's one more. I'd be willing to dedicate at least two hours a day to curate lugnet.space as well as other tangential groups, and to coordinate my efforts with other curators. James' approach is excellent; which in a nutshell is to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) Only for expressing the opinion, I think. (...) But then why do you support the mandate against profanity? I've assumed the goal of these rules is to make LUGNET a place where adults can do their thing and still be a place that parents are (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
|
|
For what it's worth, I don't thing Eduardo means any harm at all. I think he is just plain clueless. Afterall, it is not easy for a person with a different cultural and language background to understand what is acceptable and what is not. For (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) Gentlemen, I'm with you all on this one. Kevin put it all in perspective saying "how can one volunteer if there's no response when one tries?". Twice now I've asked for a pair of curatorships (.build.mecha and .org.us.lugola) in an attempt to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Links (Re: Endless Load/Unload and Transformer Train)
|
|
I am so sorry, I made a mistake, my homepage is (URL) legochina.virtulave.net Sorry again! Zhengrong (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Bad Links (Re: Endless Load/Unload and Transformer Train)
|
|
(...) Zhengrong, You do some great work, but you may want to check your web links! I don't get to your RCX Controlled LEGO Train Projects, I get redirected to www_pay2k_com/portal! And if you use your back button to get back to LUGNET you get (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in message news:Gops00.KAD@lugnet.com... (...) response. That's ok. I thought that the post in and of itself would invoke replies, but I was mistaken. At least I know Larry and I aren't alone in (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) to. (...) response. Moi aussi. There are things happening which really deserve an admin response. I also volunteered weeks ago to curate lugnet.town, both in the curators newsgroup and by email to Suz. No (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, If I'd realized you were looking for a community response, I would have stepped up sooner; I too am disappointed in the lack of administrative response. Personally, I suspect that Suz is approaching burnout WRT to Lugnet; It's a very (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
After a couple days, I'm surprised, if not sad, this hasn't been replied to. By the admins or by people in the community who feel the same way. Lar and I have had a decent offline discussion on this, compared notes, and are definitely on the same (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) I think there's a fine line here and IIRC the ToS is deliberately ambiguous on it. users are enjoined (by the discussion group terms) as follows: " 4. (do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) What does a gay-minifig look like??? Saskia (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:sandlin-2012012...ink.com... (...) His (...) can (...) opinion (...) So you can justify punishing someone for an opinion? I wouldn't approve of any racial slur being used, but that doesn't (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) Really? What if I were to use the "N" word? It's just an opinion, right? I'm sure racist or religious slurs wouldn't go over well, and likewise, neither should slurs about someone's sexual orientation. It's all hate speech. ~Grand Admiral (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) Despite having previously been labled a homophobe myself, I second this. Why not make gay characters? Heck, I might even purchase or create a couple of gay characters myself just to include in a story concept if I were so inclined to do so. (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) Homophobia is wrong in my view. Very wrong and very misguided. But expressing one's opinion about it, even if it is hateful, isn't directly against the ToS, I don't think. (...) I agree, because his speech is a strong and clear cut violation (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) It's called "homophobia" because bigotry is fear-based. Hating homosexuals is just as wrong as hating black people or Jews. XFUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate --Bill. (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
"William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m2ofktbfq0.fsf_...rds.net... (...) I think he should be repirmanded as well - only for swearing though. His response was very distasteful and out of line, though I don't think he can or should (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) Why shouldn't they make gay character's? I don't think you should tell people what to do or not to do. Don't like it, don't look at it. (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
