To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9865
9864  |  9866
Subject: 
Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:54:38 GMT
Viewed: 
204 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Brouwer writes:
In lugnet.admin.general, David Gregory writes:
I do object to the swearing, but I agree that people should not make LEGO
minifigs into gay characters.  Anyway, just because someone doesn't like gay
minifigs doesn't mean that they're homophobic.  Instead of homophobia, they
could be homoodious (hating homosexuality instead of fearing it).  Please
remember that just because someone doesn't like something, doesn't mean that
they're scared of it.
      Fuzzy

Why shouldn't they make gay character's?  I don't think you should tell
people what to do or not to do.  Don't like it, don't look at it.

Despite having previously been labled a homophobe myself, I second this.
Why not make gay characters?  Heck, I might even purchase or create a couple
of gay characters myself just to include in a story concept if I were so
inclined to do so.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
 
(...) Why shouldn't they make gay character's? I don't think you should tell people what to do or not to do. Don't like it, don't look at it. (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

22 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR