To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9865
9864  |  9866
Subject: 
Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:54:38 GMT
Viewed: 
4009 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Brouwer writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, David Gregory writes:
> > I do object to the swearing, but I agree that people should not make LEGO
> > minifigs into gay characters.  Anyway, just because someone doesn't like gay
> > minifigs doesn't mean that they're homophobic.  Instead of homophobia, they
> > could be homoodious (hating homosexuality instead of fearing it).  Please
> > remember that just because someone doesn't like something, doesn't mean that
> > they're scared of it.
> >       Fuzzy
> 
> Why shouldn't they make gay character's?  I don't think you should tell
> people what to do or not to do.  Don't like it, don't look at it.

Despite having previously been labled a homophobe myself, I second this.
Why not make gay characters?  Heck, I might even purchase or create a couple
of gay characters myself just to include in a story concept if I were so
inclined to do so.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
 
(...) Why shouldn't they make gay character's? I don't think you should tell people what to do or not to do. Don't like it, don't look at it. (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

22 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR