 | | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) My mistake. It didn't show up on my newsreader, but it shows on the web interface. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) ... (...) Mark S., I thought it was OK as long as the X-Real-Life-Name identifies you. If I look at the full headers for his post, I see: X-Real-Life-Name: Mark Papenfuss /Eric McC/ (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
mfuss903 wrote in message ... <a great deal of stuff...> Just to clarify, my message asking whether Jake's post was appropriate in .announce was directed ONLY to lugnet.admin.general, not to lego.direct, and the admin posts don't appear on the main (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Fix for a broken link
|
|
Todd, In the (URL) page their is a link to Matt's Track Designer. The link to this was changed when I took over the hosting of The Train Depot. The new link is (URL) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) For us AFOLs, it was an incredibly nice thing to do. And for LD, it's a nice way to gather a data point on our buying power. It's a win-win. But... (...) Actually, it doesn't really belong in the main .announce group -- it was an unsolicited (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Sounds like you're the one who needs to relax. Read Mark's post... probably better than I could write in reply to you. Dude, chill out, the inflammatory nature of your messages telling people to relax is pretty durn hypocritical. -Tim (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) There are specific guidelines set up on the newsgroups to keep things orderly. If people posted anywhere they liked, things would get rather messy and confusing. When I was a newbie, I posted an auction announcement to .space, and people (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Why not?? I mean true, it is not for trade - but it is for SALE and you can BUY it - right? I think sometimes you people have lost sight of the forest, AND are missing the trees while you are at it. R-E-L-A-X !!!! (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
All in all, what does it really matter???? I mean, they made a SPECIAL effort to offer these sets to US FIRST - they could have easily ignored us alltogether, but no - They gave us first shot. I would definitely say this belongs in all of the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) I should say can't always; the first reply was just after a meeting and just before lunch -- happened to check in and see it just after you posted it. (...) Ah, neat...it worked. I love Forte Free Agent! And it's really nice on my Crusoe (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) other rather than as separate "words," ya? My parser doesn't expect the < and the > to occur in the same word. I'll need to fix that before you can put them so close together. If you type <10 >10 (note the space character between the "0" and (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Block List?
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G8nrIv.KFs@lugnet.com... (...) Make that two annoying (and this second one incredibly rude and arrogant) posters. -Tim (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) (URL)There's also this, which isn't linked in yet: (...) I know the previous search was suspected of causing you system-wide problems but the cool thing about it was being able to search for posts made by particular individuals and getting (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Block List?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G8K59x.LF3@lugnet.com... (...) Well I finally blocked a very annoying poster on my newsreader, and would like to do that on the web too. (...) Cool... can we talk tomorrow about this at BC? (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Posting Failure to lugnet robotics
|
|
I have been trying for a week or two to get posting via email working. It works via the web, but I can not get it to work via mail. I get the followng response: Your message could not be accepted. Response from the news server: 441 Invalid mailer: (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) You should get this: (URL) doesn't see anything posted by Brad himself, so it starts with posts mentiong his name posted by others. (...) What URL appeared, and from what area (category) did you initiate the search? (...) I'd have to see the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
Todd: I have read the search function described at: (URL) I can't see that the instructions there work. For example: when searching "brad justus <10 >10", without the quotes, what ideally should I get back as a result set? What I got was stuff from (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Well on the same note the post doesn't belong in BST either. Rose Kevin Wilson wrote in message ... (...) my (...) (25 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) It's not, no... But fortunately, there's a simple solution for future things of this type -- LD can (please) post to the .announce.lsahs group instead of the main .announce group. The .announce.lsahs group is specifically set up for LEGO Shop (...) (25 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Good question. I don't think it is. I saw it, did a double take, got a little grated by it, but figured it was an honest mistake and given the tension lately with LD, I figured it best not to say something...for now. (...) --Todd (25 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
