 | | Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Jeff Boen
|
| | | (...) this brings to mind a question for me... surely in all of our huddled AFOL masses there must be an attorney, or at least someone with a smidge of legal background???? if not, if there isn't someone on the inside who can provide legal direction (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Jeff, I'm sorry but you actually don't know what you're talking about. I know for a fat that many of the events that have transpired over the last few days warrant quite a bit of concern. Thank you. --Todd (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) "I know for a fat"? I mean, I know for a fact... :-, --Todd (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Random aside - I do wish there was an "edit" button on the LUGNET web interface that would give us the ability to edit our messages once they have been posted if we catch an error within 5 minutes or so. But that's probably not possible (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The NNTP posting interface supports both cancel and supersede, the latter being what you want. What happens with the mail interface when a message is being cancelled or superseded? I realize, of course, that mail that has already been sent out (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | | (...) ahhh.. okay.. i see... so basically i made the statement saying that perhaps we should look to people who know what they're talking about.. and all you can say is that i'm wrong.. i didn't say i'm positive of anything... to quote myself "no (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think we should; I think people will trust the information Brad brings back from Billund next week. (...) See, that's a false statement. It's not true that no one here knows for certain whether any of the events that have transpired over the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I just now got back to this thread.. and I appreciate your words very much... I agree that you and I both were getting slightly irate and perhaps a little obstinant in our stances... kid gloves are not accessories I own, so I rarely find the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | (...) Your remarks are less than helpful. (...) If it's legalese you crave, I'm sure you're capable of doing your own homework. (...) My primary concern was not how I would look to you. (...) Be glad there is no such thing as the LEGO police. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Mike Faunce
|
| | | | | | Was this announcement/explanation ever posted? If so, I missed it. Mike Suzanne D. Rich <suz@media.mit.edu> wrote in message news:FMoD01.DE6@lugnet.com... (...) like (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | No, I'm sorry I haven't posted yet. I have been thinking long and hard about what I should/could say here. I think I should say as little as possible, so I will be brief. Sorry if my line breaks here are screwed up, Netscape bug. :-\ ---...--- The (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | | | (...) wow... that's pretty much *exactly* what i was asking to hear as all of this progressed... (not the specifics of your LEGO involvement, how could we have known?!?, but your knowledge of what *is* and *is not* going to be a problem for this (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | Thanks Suzanne. It's good to hear what your thinking about all of this. (...) This is an interesting point. Personally, I put my own interests above those of the Lego Company, and I think that's true for a lot of us here. That's not even a painful (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) Or, "you're". *sigh*. (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear) —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | (...) I'm not. It's just a growing pain. Todd and Suz want SO BADLY for LEGO to respect our community. They want it so badly that they freak out a bit when something happens that might tarnish our rep. To have these things happen so closely in (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
