To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Search Results: internet mail service
 Results 381 – 400 of about 2200.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Badgering emails
 
(...) True. If LUGENT's servers end up on a blacklist again, it would be everyone's problem. But while Kevin could (and probably should) ask his ISP to unblock Larry's server, I would doubt one user would actually make much of an impact on them. So (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.476)

  Re: Badgering emails
 
(...) There's no faulting flowing from this direction, merely a statement that there's a problem at the user's end. (...) Sorry, why not? I'm not clear on that really. If a user has a malformed or malfunctioning mail, why isn't that the user's issue (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.476)

  Re: Badgering emails
 
(...) Not necessarily. LUGNET does not have this ability, as I understand it. It is possible to construct an email that shows the "from:" as being from a lugnet.com email address, but, again, as I understand it, not to have the email actually be (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.476)

  Re: Badgering emails
 
(...) Yes, honestly, I am. Not for me but for the other admins too. As I said, we had some situations in the past where emails (from other admins, NOT from me) went blocked or went lost and we, the admins, had no idea it happened. I agree that short (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.476)

  Re: Posting Policy Changes
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: ... (...) Wow! I had to search around even to find that feedback address. Since I rarely visit the front page (it's pretty much useless IMO) I never would have found it tucked away down at the bottom (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 

mail
(score: 0.476)

  Re: Badgering emails
 
(...) That's not accurate. What IS accurate is that when I discovered there was a problem, I talked to my support and based on what they told me then, I said to you that the problem was at your end. Later on, you insinuated that I was deliberately (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.476)

  Re: Badgering emails
 
(...) Ok - but that doesn't change my point. It's out of YOUR control if Yahoo accepts messages from Larry's server. You'd have no way of knowing if it does or doesn't until you actually are sent one. On the other hand, you KNOW that mail from (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.476)

  (canceled)
 
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  Re: Imperial Guard Backpack
 
(...) So you know this is against the Terms of Service yet you do it anyway? Not too cool in my opinion. The buy-sell-trade is there for a reason and if people are looking for something they will check there. Eric Remove ".nospam" when replying by (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail, service
(score: 0.475)

  Re: Another resignation: I'm stepping down.
 
(...) Define "active". Does activity require a specific number of posts per day for a particular group? A specific number of views per day? A specific number of e-mail subscriptions? Who is to set the baseline for comparison? This growth, or (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  (canceled)
 
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  Re: One comment
 
(...) What we consider profane differs, I guess. But it's not that big a deal. I just wanted to make sure that no one could say you posted a link to something objectionable without warning about it, that's all. (recall that you asked about that very (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  Re: LUGNET members association
 
(...) Sorry, that was rhetoric. LUGNET is not infinite so there never has been an "endless" one. But there have been lots of interminable ones, don't you agree? (...) For a "made up" example The decision would be "person A gets a timeout of 48 hours (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
 
Leonard Hoffman wrote: If Kevin felt he couldn't in good faith (...) re: your last 5 words See, this is what people mean when they say transparency. (1) I have a HUGE post to go public, but i am sitting on it. WHY, cause out of respect i am hoping (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  Bug fixed
 
Just a short note - while working on something else, I ran into a bug I forgot about. When posting to multiple groups via SMTP, the poster would get multiple copies of the authentication message - one for every group posted to - even though any of (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp) ! 
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  Email Postings being swallowed
 
If my spelling is off, it's because I'm posting through the web interface. :-) The problem of email postings just disappearing into the ether has been around for quite a while. Basically I write a post, mail it in, and get no auth responce. So I (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  Application for Lugnet Membership
 
Hi all, More than a month ago I applied for Lugnet membership. It took some time to get the money transfer organized (I'm no paypal member, and other means where simply not acceptable because of the banking fees involved), but Rene of 1000steine.de (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.475)

  Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
 
In lugnet.general, Shaun Sullivan wrote: (snip) I've went through this whole thread tree up to as of just now, and added everything that I thought looked like a suggestion to our (URL) list>. If you think you made a suggestion in this thread or (...) (19 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
 

mail
(score: 0.474)

  Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
 
(...) Seriously jeopardised? (...) It's not the only thing that matters, no, but posts to .announce.* and in particular, posts to announce.moc get an upweighting, and posts to .admin.* and .off-topic.* get a downweighting. That was spoecifically in (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
 

mail
(score: 0.474)

  Re: My First MOC
 
(...) Rather than asking everyone to email you replies, you may want to look into subscribing to the group (perhaps temporarily) by email, via this URL: (URL) first doing this subscription setup: (URL) to get your confirmation code ) XFUT (...) (20 years ago, 9-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.474)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR