|
 | | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) I know. :) I was asking Steve what his opinion was. (...) What about a gatewaying through a sub-group? -- i.e., something like one of the following: lugnet.cad.dev lugnet.cad.devel lugnet.cad.develop lugnet.cad.developer lugnet.cad.developers (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Informal CFD: robotics competition newsgroup(s)
|
| (...) I could go either way. I suppose that a lugnet.comp.* hierarchy could expand someday, to cover various software packages and online stuff. No, wait. I changed my mind. How much potential is there for *computer-centered* discussion on lugnet? (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Posting with MIME encoded FROM header
|
| (...) Hmm, I don't know. At first I want to say no it shouldn't -- because it's totally unreadable with that encoding. But OTOH, maybe yes it should, because maybe modern newsreaders are smart enough to decode that into 8-bit ISO characters on the (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) Steve, You're much more in touch with people's feeling on this issue than I am. I don't really understand the disadvantages...all I see are advantages... But then again, I'm probably biased because I'm not a fan of e-mail for threaded (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| (...) Yes, it is the normal default for messages to not be sent back to the sender. There are a couple of listserv commands to alter that: " You can also tell LISTSERV how you want it to confirm the receipt of messages you send to the list. If you (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Mailing list gateways
|
| Todd: (...) Just to remind you of my opinion on this question. I would like to keep the l-cad mailing list for technical problems regarding the internals of LEGO CAD software (file formats, creating new parts, etc.), and use lugnet.cad for the "user (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | ng/ml gatewaying
|
| (...) It would be possible, yes -- (and actually very easy) -- but doing so may open up a can of worms. I'll give more details below, and maybe you'll have some ideas to suggest. (...) Everyone posting via NNTP actually does put e-mail addresses in, (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
| (...) Tom, Here are the options: (This topic has been kicking around for a time :) 1) Mike crossposts to lugnet.announce and lugnet.market.shopping, with followups set to lugnet.market.shopping. (Maybe also crossposting to lugnet.general, but anyone (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
| (...) I prefer option #2 only because my work e-mail system does not support filters, and I have to restrict the bandwidth. (The system at work is a main frame that is home grown, and is rather primitive.) The choice <lugnet.announce.lsah> would be (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line wrapping in lugnet.cad.dat files
|
| (...) Nope. lugnet.cad.dat:50 was posted through your newsreader rather than the web interface or the e-mail gateway. (The 'X-Nntp-Posting-Host' header says 146.phoenix-05-10rs....ss.att.net rather than (URL) or a gateway address), so the problem is (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
| (...) I would prefer this. Or even as a separate news group that I can subscribe to by e-mail to my office address. They frown very much on large amounts of non business mail, but once a week should be OK. Gary GaryLouie@EarthLink.Net (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
| (...) I like #2 also. I don't have a lot of time, as I already spend too much of it here enjoyably mucking about, to do a lot of email. My computer's demand has almost doubled since we started getting software for my daughter. I did subscribe (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: Line wrapping in lugnet.cad.dat files
|
| (...) Cool, you can test away some more then, if you like... With regard to logging it as a bug, I thought about the problem a bit more and decided to fix it right away rather than queueing it up. The same part of the code which checks for special (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: ng/ml gatewaying
|
| (...) Seriously? Okie dokie then, this'll be a snap to fix. Happy day! I'll disable 'From'-header munging for the lugnet.robotics->lego-robotics gateway (leaving it in for now on the other ng/ml gateways). You'll still be able to see real-life names (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
| (...) a) and c). And a little of b) too, because I'm not sure regularly-occurring events belong in an announcment group. But i think it's probably the best currently-available place to put it. lugnet.announce.shopping doesn't help with what I want (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
|
| | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
| (...) That's what I was worried about. (...) Sounds good to me. In fact, almost anyone receiving lugnet.announce by e-mail could easily filter things so that messages posted to lugnet.announce by Mike Stanley received special treatment, with the (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.176)
|
